When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
Not everyone needs a fancy, high-end TV with a laundry list of features.
Take theSony Bravia 3and theSamsung Q60D, for instance.
To learn more about Dolby Vision, check out our guide towhether or not you need Dolby Visionat all.
If you’re hoping to watch over-the-air broadcasts in 4K, the Bravia 3 will get you there.
The Bravia 3’s feet are slim and boomerang-shaped, while the Q60D’s are more L-shaped.
However, the Q60D offers a bit more flexibility in its setup.
When attaching the feet to the Q60D’s panel, users have a choice of two configurations.
A secondary setup lifts the panel higher to accommodate a soundbar.
The Q60D is also much thinner than itsSonycounterpart.
It has a depth of about an inch, and its uniformly thick across the entire chassis.
This gives the Q60D an air of elegance.
By comparison, the Bravia 3 is a bit on the beefy side.
It’s a little over two inches thick, and it bulges out partway down the panel.
This is mostly due to the slimness of its panel.
The Bravia 3 is at full-throttle brightness more often.
Due to their limited display hardware, contrast is subpar on both sets.
Once again, though, the Bravia 3 has an edge when it comes to display tech.
The Bravia 3’s excellent picture processing is worth calling out, too.
On the gaming side of things, you shouldn’t expect much from either model.
You’ll have to spend up to get those features.
It features slightly better display hardware and superior picture processing.
The interface is easy to navigate and Sony’s menu options are integrated well.
There is a vast library of downloadable apps to supplement those that arrive out of the box.
If a soundbar is part of your setup, suddenly you’re down to just one HDMI port.
They’re especially good picks for those who might be upgrading to 4K for the first time.
If I were choosing between the two, I would go for the Bravia 3.
More from Tom’s Guide
