When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
The SE and Active 2 are also quite comfortable, even when worn while sleeping.
It gives old-school chronometer vibes.
That distinction aside, these two watches have more in common than not.
Which begs the question, which one is the more accurate fitness tracker?
With both devices on hand, I decided to find out.
When all was said and done, one of the two smartwatches generated more accurate data than the other.
Read on to find out which.
The same goes for its design.
Fortunately, that’s not the case.
Now, back to the walk test.
With just under four miles covered, here’s how the results from these two wallet-friendly wearables compare.
This is an impressive outcome.
While the SE undercounted by a mere 14 steps, the Active 2 overcounted by 81.
Strava, meanwhile, calculated my total at 7,046 steps.
The only major outlier between the two is Amazfit’s off-the-charts elevation gain data.
So, is Amazfits funky elevation data an anomaly or a bug?
Another outlier is Strava’s average pace, which is two minutes faster than the smartwatches.
![Apple Watch SE (2nd Gen) GPS…
However, I don’t find this too concerning.
Apple Watch SE vs. Amazfit Active 2: and the winner is… Out of the 7,000 steps I took, the SE counted all but 14.
That’s darn precise.
Look for that to be published soon.
In the mean time, get those steps in.