When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
With matching $299 price tags, each of these smartwatches boasts impressive onboard fitness and location tracking tech.
But only one can win this showdown.
Other datapoints like distance, climb, pace and heart accuracy were also considered.
So, which unit will come out on top in this bout?
While both start at $299, only the Galaxy Watch 7 comes with (optional) cellular connectivity.
On the flip side, all thebest Garmin watchesplay nicely with both Android and iOS.
Another downside of the Samsung is battery life.
I averaged roughly24 hours per chargewhen testing it.
The Garmin Vivoactive 6, meanwhile, consistently lasts for an entireweek per chargein my testing.
(The full review coming soon.)
You also get useful safety tools on either model, including fall/crash detection.
There are some differences in the build quality.
The Galaxy Watch 7 boasts a metal case, while the case on the Vivoactive 6 is mostly plastic.
The Samsung also has a brighter screen.
Finally, the Galaxy Watch 7 and Vivoactive 6 each track a huge variety of workout types.
The Vivoctive 6 is Garmin’s freshest wearable.
It’s also easy-wearing, well-built, and available in two sizes, with or without cellular connectivity.
In this case, the Garmin was on my left wrist and the Samsung was on my right.
As a control for distance, pace and elevation data, I also runStravaon my trustyiPhone 12 mini.
Next, the fun begins.
Strava, meanwhile, placed my total at 6,506 steps, besting both wearables.
Elevation data is less consistent.
This is a bit more than I expected, but still in a reasonable realm of accuracy.
The Garmin watch, however, is off by a more significant 34 feet.
Fortunately, pace data is remarkably similar across the board.
I know I am, at least, a little.
But alas, I was wrong.
