When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
The final round ofAI Madnesswas betweenDeepSeek and Gemini 2.0.
I just had to know, too.
Use a gentle, whimsical tone.
“Gemini 2.5did a lovely job especially with the glowing mushrooms and whispering streams, both great world-building.
Bolts anxious behaviors make him relatable.
Real-world problem-solving
Prompt:My 10-year-old is nervous about speaking in front of the class.
Give me three strategies I can teach them to help them feel more confident.
Gemini 2.5offered advice that is correct and thoughtful, and would likely work well for parents.
However, its more adult in tone, less imaginative.
The strategies are effective but less tactile or game-like, which can matter a lot for young kids.
DeepSeekwent beyond just naming strategies: it shows how to practice them in a fun and interactive way.
Analytical reasoning
Prompt:Compare the leadership styles of Nelson Mandela and Steve Jobs.
What made each of them effective, and in what ways did they differ?”
Gemini 2.5answered in a clear, comprehensive, and textbook-accurate way.
However, the response reads more like a school report.
The response is heavy on definitions (e.g., servant leadership, pacesetting) but light on fresh perspective.
It did a nice job balancing admiration with critique, avoiding adulation.
Winner: DeepSeek winsfor analytical clarity, emotional punch, and memorable phrasing.
The chatbot not only compares but interprets the leadership of Mandela and Jobs in a way that resonates.
Geminileaned more toward language instruction than poetic exploration, offering a more mechanical than lyrical response.
Then explain how the function works in simple terms."
Geminimet the prompts request to both write the function and explain how it works in simple terms.
The comprehensive yet approachable explanation offered clean code structure and subtle efficiency optimization.
DeepSeekoffers a superior explanation that is annotated with clear section titles.
It makes even the abstract idea of checking up to the square root feel intuitive.
Moral reasoning
Prompt:“Is it ever ethical to lie?
Give one example where lying might be morally justified, and explain why.”
Geminimentions consequentialism and duties, but it leans more theoretical.
The chatbot uses a fictionalized example, which is only somewhat impactful and emotionally charged.
Both chatbots had a solid answer, but DeepSeeks real-world example made it a better answer.
“Geminisresponse was detailed, yet generic, and lacked the neat structure of DeepSeek.
It occasionally leans too far into dense, overly flowery phrasing, which might lose some readers.
It presents a future thats not only visually stunning but emotionally resonant and socially insightful.
Geminicrafted a solid and competent response, but DeepSeeks has more voice, humor, and spark.
Full disclosure, I was ready to call the test after prompt five.
I was starting to get Deja vu..
However, I kept going because I just had to know if Gemini would winanything.
