When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
In the first round ofAI Madnesswe are going head-to-head withChatGPT-4ovsPerplexity AI.
OpenAIs ChatGPT is known for consistently delivering reliable, up-to-date information, often matching or surpassing competitors.
It interprets user queries in context, providing personalized search results accompanied by concise summaries and inline citations.
Heres a breakdown of how they performed and the ultimate winner.
Perplexitysimply answered the question wrong, which automatically makes it fail this round.
The inclusion of potentially related queries is informative, but diverts from the main question.
ChatGPTwins for a detailed and accurate response.
The back-and-forth, lively conversation between them seems natural and is fun to read.
Additionally, the use of stage directions made the story come to life.
Perplexitydelivered a story that feels slightly more serious and formal.
It lacks the creative and lighthearted banter that ChatGPT does so well.
The ending was also weaker, lacking a punchline.
ChatGPT winsfor its witty, engaging, and well-structured dialogue.
It feels more like a conversation between two quirky personalities rather than a debate between abstract concepts.
List key factors they should consider and briefly explain the reasoning behind each one."
ChatGPTdelivered a clear and digestible response that better explains important factors while also being easy to skim.
It brings up several important points including a stronger final decision and summary.
Perplexityrepeated concepts in a few sections yet lacked a clear side-by-side comparison.
Perplexity formatted the response in a dense paragraph, which made it harder to skim.
And while Perplexity lists important factors, it doesnt summarize or weigh them.
ChatGPT winsfor presenting the key factors in a more structured, balanced, and decision-oriented way.
While Perplexity provides accurate information, ChatGPTs organization, clarity, and user-friendliness make it the better response.
ChatGPTbroke down the process with steps that are clear and easy to follow.
The sections are well-defined, separating them for easy instruction.
The use of bullet points is helpful and emojis add a user-friendly casualness.
The common mistakes section is useful as are the recommendations.Perplexitylacked actionable instructions and was too dense and less engaging.
The formatting feels bulky, making it harder to skim and digest.
“ChatGPTsversion feels like a true animated sequence with a clear beginning, middle, and end.
The dialogue is natural and friendly, making it feel more engaging for young audiences.
Perplexitystructured the story more like an instructional manual rather than an engaging animated sequence.
It was not as fun or kid-friendly as ChatGPTs version.
Perplexity AIs response is informative but lacks storytelling depth and excitement.
