When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
BothChatGPTandGeminiare considered among thebest AI image generatorsout there.
But not all image generators are created equal.
The results werent always what I expected.
In some cases, one tool clearly outshone the other.
In others, it came down to style versus realism.
A photorealistic bowl of ramen on a wooden table
For this prompt, I wanted to testhyperrealism.
If either image could pass for a real restaurant photo at a glance, Id call that a win.
Both models did well here but ChatGPT took the win.
The image looked genuinely photorealistic, right down to the fine details like rising steam and glossy broth.
If I saw it in my feed, I probably wouldnt question it.
Geminis version, on the other hand, didnt quite land the same way.
The egg looked flat and lacked dimension, and the overall composition felt less convincing.
It wasnt bad, but it didnt pass the is this real?
test quite like ChatGPTs did.
Think e-commerce-ready: sharp edges, studio lighting, and realistic material textures.
Its a test of how well each AI can produce commercial-style visuals with minimal background noise.
The prompt might seem simple, but thats exactly why it matters accuracy and presentation are everything.
I couldn’t fit both images on the same slide,so the Gemini one is below.
Both AIs did a decent job interpreting the prompt but Gemini came out ahead on this one.
The shadowing and texture work were excellent, giving the shoes real dimension and weight.
There was even a soft glow effect that added to the futuristic vibe.
Its not just about following instructions, but creating something with mood.
ChatGPT absolutely nailed this one.
Gemini, meanwhile, went a bit too literal.
A vintage-style travel poster for Mars
This ones all about graphic design and stylistic aesthetics.
Its less about realism and more about artistic control and visual language.
This one was a close call, but ChatGPT just edged it.
You could genuinely imagine it hanging in a retro sci-fi exhibition.
It felt more like a posterinspiredby the era, rather than something madeinit.
Theres absolutely no doubt that Gemini smashed this one.
The portrait was high-resolution, perfectly lit and packed with detail.
From the skin texture to the subtle overlining of the lips, every element was spot on.
I scrutinized the image, looking for something anything off, and came up empty.
The realism was exceptional, easily on par with what youd expect fromMidjourney.
Final thoughts….
Across all five prompts, ChatGPT takes the crown.
It handled artistic prompts with confidence and delivered visuals that felt thoughtfully composed, not just generated.
That said, Gemini absolutely held its own and in some areas, outperformed ChatGPT.
Its hyper-realistic portrait was flawless, and it nailed the product-style shot with better texture and depth.
It also has one major edge: Gemini generated images noticeably faster than ChatGPT throughout the test.
If speed and realism are your priorities, Gemini is well worth using.
Check out5 mind-blowing ChatGPT prompts youll wish you knew soonerand11 prompting tipsto get better results.
And you’re able to evenreplace Alexa with ChatGPT on your Amazon Echo.
