When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
No wonder this handset is both abest phoneandbest camera phonecontender.
In fact, I’d argue that its better in low light than both thePixel 8aandiPhone 16e.
(Image credit: Future)
It’s worth pointing out that the even cheaperNothing Phone 3ashares the same 50MP main sensor.
Heres what I found.
All of the details around the tree are better exposed over the Nothing Phone 2as shot.
(Image credit: Future)
Youll see why its the better mode to shoot astrophotography with the Nothing Phone 3a Pro.
It doesnt seem that long, but still can have a big impact.
you could see how the stars in most of the shots look like theyre streaking as a result.
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
Its good, but I still get better handheld results from flagship phones.
All the stars are better defined with this method.
Another peculiar trait is that the Nothing Phone 3a Pro automatically adjusts its shooting at ISO 16,620.
Despite this, the shots are still good in my opinion.
This is because I can set the shutter speed to as long as 32 seconds.
But despite this, Im still impressed by the quality for a phone that costs $459.
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
For what it delivers, Im really surprised by the results from this sub-$500 phone.
Phones in this price range always struggle under low light.
Yet, the Nothing Phone 3a Pro ditches that stigma.
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
(Image credit: Tom’s Guide / John Velasco)
