When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
Since its launch last week, the AI agentManushas rapidly gained traction online.
2 million people on the waitlist.
Heres what happened when I put the two models head-to-head with five prompts.
“ChatGPTprovided a structured breakdown of key UBI impacts and included a balanced discussion of positives and negatives.
However, the response was extremely dense and very academic.
The highly technical detail made the response too hard to digest for a general audience.
Manus went far too deep in this case.
ChatGPTcrafted a poem with a rhythmic and musical quality that mirrors the bustling yet harmonious urban environment.
The imagery is vivid, with a creative mix of natural elements and urban architecture.
The poem encapsulates the transient beauty of autumn.
Manupresented a longer, free-verse poem rich in sensory details and metaphoric language.
The image here shows just one of the five stanzas.
Technical explanation
Prompt:“Explain the concept of blockchain technology to a non-technical audience.”
ChatGPTgave a solid and clear explanation, while making blockchain technology less intimidating.
The response is concise and gets straight to the point, making the explanation brief for a quick overview.
The engaging metaphors and real-world use cases helped to breakdown the complexity of the subject.
Ethical dilemma
Prompt:“Discuss the ethical considerations of using AI in surveillance systems.
“ChatGPTuses real-world examples and covers multiple ethical concerns.
The chatbot also provided actionable solutions for each concern, which made the response practical for a general audience.
However, it lacked theoretical depth and offered limited regulatory discussion.
Manusdiscusses a variety of perspectives in extreme detail and depth.
Everything from multi-stakeholder views and global regulatory strategies are analyzed.
Advanced reasoning
Prompt:Two cyclists start riding toward each other from two towns that are 300 miles apart.
Provide a detailed step-by-step explanation of your reasoning.
On average, the responses from Manus took over twice as long to generate than ChatGPT.
Often, Manus responded with a far more extensive answer than was needed, making it less user-friendly.
ChatGPT always responded in a straightforward way that got straight to the point.
Manus is the winner here, but is it practical to use regularly?
From my experience, no.
ChatGPT naturally knows when to go a little deeper and when to give an overview.
