When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
Ever wonder what other people actually ask ChatGPT?
I couldnt resist trying them out the competition to understand what users are missing or avoiding.
So heres what happened when I had Gemini 2.5,Googles free andsmartest modelanswer those popular ChatGPT queries.
Explain [X] like Im 5
Prompt:“Explain quantum physics like Im five.
“ChatGPT-4okept its response short and sweet, focusing on two key concepts.
The chatbot covered more quantum concepts: superposition, wave-particle duality, and quantized energy levels.
The response is overall more active and playful.
Comparison breakdown:If you want the simplest, most concise explanation than go with ChatGPT.
But if you want a more detailed, playful, and varied explanation use this prompt with Gemini.
Summarize this text/article
Example:“Summarize Taylor Swifts song Shake it Off in 3 sentences.
“ChatGPT-4ohit the core message in a simple and punchy way.
It uses energetic language that matches the songs vibe.
Comparison breakdown:For a catchy, high-energy summary, ChatGPT is the go-to chatbot.
Its more playful and concise, mirroring the songs carefree attitude.
For a slightly more analytical, polished take Gemini is the chatbot you want to prompt.
The model was clearer about the songs conflict but still upbeat.
Write a cover letter/resume
Example:“Write a cover letter for a social media manager applying toNike.
“ChatGPT-4ogot to the point quickly with a strong hook while still being professional.
The storytelling was brief but specific with energy that aligned better with the brand.
Gemini 2.5wrote a highly detailed and structured cover letter that clearly outlines the companys brand values.
If you prefer a detailed, customizable template than use this prompt with Gemini.
ChatGPT-4oefficiently and clearly developed a readable function that avoids unnecessary imports.
It also included a quick demo, which developers might find helpful.
It also retains some of the song’s rhythm so it is still nursery rhyme-like, just formalized.
The tone is engaging.
Gemini 2.5offered multiple versions (formal narrative, procedural tone, cause-and-effect), which offers users flexibility.
Translate this or How do you say [X] in [language]?
Example:“Translate Hope is the thing with feathers into Japanese.
“ChatGPT-4ocrafted poetic phrasing that matches the original lyrical tone while overall delivering a clearer presentation.
The emojis are a nice touch.Gemini 2.5delivered a detailed breakdown of each word/phrase.
The literal translation was so overly precise that the response was almost too formal.
Users who care about artistic impact over linguistic dissection should stick with ChatGPT.
Users who prefer hyper-literal accuracy over stylistic flair and need a grammar lesson or word-by-word analysis should use Gemini.
7. Who would win in a fight between [fictional characters]?
Example:“Who would win: Batman or Iron Man?
“ChatGPT-4oused humor and emojis for a more entertaining response that is concise and punchy.
The verdict was clear in the response.Gemini 2.5crafted balanced arguments and was extremely thorough.
The chatbot is context-aware, acknowledging that the outcome depends on circumstances (prep time, random encounter).
Go with Gemini for a more comprehensive, neutral analysis with more facts and scenarios.
For quick, punchy, and aesthetically pleasing results, ChatGPT remains a strong contender.
For in-depth, structured, and meticulously documented information, Gemini 2.5 proves invaluable.
